More coursework: 1 - A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I - J | K - L | M | N - O | P - S | T | U - Y

Critique of death of the author

Critique of "Death of the Author"

The title to the story "The Death of an Author," by Roland Barthes,

suggests this story may be a fictional novel about the story of an author's

death. Perhaps one might pick it up, and skim the foreword in hopes that beneath

the cover of this book there would be a mystery, a story of detectives, eye-

witnesses, clues, and a puzzle for the reader to solve. Before I read this

story, the title "The Death of an Author" brought to my imagination the

biography of a writer slowly drinking himself to death trying to finish the

story of his life, but the author would be stuck and depressed because his life

is not a story as it is boring and repetitive. I have read such short stories

with similar titles by authors like Raymond Carver and others. I was surprised

when I began to read "The Death of an Author" that a story with such a powerful

title would be a wordy, whimper of a passage.

The author Roland Barthes is a brilliant writer, he is able to weave

phrases and create new uses for verbs, nouns and adjectives. Though he is a

brilliant writer I have to assume that he was not a very bright man or that he

at least has very little common sense outside of the literary world. If he wrote

in a more simple, to the point modern style I would have read the story,

absorbed its content, and would not have given it a second look. The story

could be summarized into 3 lines and thus reduce the amount of paper it is

replicated on the amount of bandwidth required to transmit it, the space it

takes, and the time it takes to read it. I came to this conclusion after reading

"The Death of an Author" for the fourth or fifth time. I began to wonder why

does this man write this way? What caused him to have so much distrust toward

the critics? Those are the thoughts he was trying to persuade us not to think.

Barthes wanted the author of the story to be no more than a name printed on the

top or front of a book. Throughout the story "The Death of an Author," Barthes

refers to the author as a scriptor in stating "Succeeding the Author, the

scriptor no longer bears within him passions, humors, feelings, impressions but

rather this immense dictionary from which he draws a writing that can know no

halt." Barthes announces that a scriptor is superior to an author but they are

the same. Now if a scriptor is superior to an author this passage drags on and

on, never circulating around a single point. A scriptor does not try to make art

of the two-hundred and fifty-five symbols placed in front of him. A scriptor

arranges the symbols in an order that once decoded can be read back and can

convey whatever message the scriptor recorded. Barthes reveals his knowledge of

this in writing, "Once the author is removed, the claim to decipher a text

becomes quite futile. To give a text an Author is to impose a limit on that text,

to furnish it with a final signified, to close the writing."

I believe that Barthes is truly an author. His style of writing, as

demonstrated in "The Death of an Author," is wordy and not clear and it invites

self proclaimed critics and causal readers to try to read between the lines and

to criticize Barthes himself. We rarely look at the writers who write in the

magazine articles, newspapers, short stories that we read today. we read today

magazine articles, newspapers, short stories. We do not read these items to

gain the author's perspective on the subject. We read them for our enjoyment,

for the knowledge contained in them, or maybe so that by reading the story it

will become a part of us and we will become a part of it. It is lines like

"Though the sway of the Author remains powerful it goes without saying that

certain writers have long since attempted to loosen it." How come Barthes is

not one of these authors? Has Barthes made this critic situation worse? (If

this situation bothers anyone but Barthes). Barthes' writing has a great

overtone of irony because everyone who reads this will criticize the author and

not the story.

When we over-criticize a story or a book, we as people tend to go deeper

than the words printed on the paper. We dream and try to imagine where these

words came from and why are they here before me in this order. The

Request Removal

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on our website then please click on the link below to request removal:

Request the removal of this essay.

Did you know we also write... EssayWritingServices Essay Writing Services Dissertation Writing Services Assignment Writing Services Coursework Writing Services Other Academic Services

 

comments powered by Disqus