More coursework: 1 - A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I - J | K - L | M | N - O | P - S | T | U - Y

A farewell to arms 3

John Stubbs' "Love and Role Playing in A

Farewell to Arms"

John Stubbs' essay is an examination of the defense which he believes Henry and Catherine use to

protect themselves from the discovery of their insignificance and " a world

indifferent to their well being..." He asserts that "role-playing" by the two main characters, and

several others in the book, is a way to escape the realization of human mortality which is unveiled

by war. Stubbs thinks that Hemingway utilized role-playing as a way to "explore the strengths and

weaknesses of his two characters." Stubbs says that by placing Henry's ordered life in opposition

to Catherine's topsy-turvy one, and then letting each one assume a role which will bring them

closer together, Hemingway shows the pair's inability to accept "the hard, gratuitous quality of life."

Stubbs begins by showing other examples, notably in In Our Time and The Sun Also Rises, in

which Hemingway's characters revert to role-playing in order to escape or retreat from their lives.

The ability to create characters who play roles, he says, either to "maintain self-esteem" or to

escape, is one Hemingway exploits extraordinarily well in A Farewell to Arms and therefore it "is

his richest and most successful handling of human beings trying to come to terms with their


As far as Stubbs is concerned, Hemingway is quite blatant in letting us know that role-playing is

what is occurring. He tells that the role-playing begins during Henry and Catherine's third

encounter, when Catherine directly dictates what is spoken by Henry. After this meeting the two

become increasingly comfortable with their roles and easily adopt them whenever the other is

nearby. This is apparent also in that they can only successfully play their roles when they are in

private and any disturbance causes the "game" to be disrupted. The intrusion of the outside world

in any form makes their role-playing impossible, as evidenced at the race track in Milan, where

they must be alone. The people surrounding them make Catherine feel uncomfortable and Henry

has to take her away from the crowd. He goes on to describe how it is impossible for them to play

the roles when they are apart and how they therefore become more dependent upon each other's


Stubbs goes on to explain how, "neither mistakes role-playing for a truly intimate relationship, but

both recognize that it can be a useful device for satisfying certain emotional needs." He says that

originally Henry and Catherine are playing the "game" for different reasons but eventually move to

play it as a team. Henry is role-playing to regain the sense of order he has lost when he realizes the

futility of the war and his lack of place in it. Catherine is role-playing to deal with the loss of her

fiance and to try to find order in the arena of the war. When they are able to role-play together,

"the promise of mutual support" is what becomes so important to them as they try to cope with

their individual human vulnerability.

He also analyzes the idyllic world introduced early in the story by the priest at the mess and later

realized by Henry and Catherine in Switzerland. They fall fully into their roles when they row

across the lake on their way to their idealized world. The fact that they actually are able to enter

this make-believe world strengthens their "game" and allows it to continue longer than it would

have otherwise. And once they are in this new world they adopt new roles which allow them to

continue their ruse. They also need to work harder to maintain the "game" because far from the

front they are both still aware the war is proceeding and they are no longer a part of it. The world

in which they exist in reality (!) is not conducive to role-playing because it tries repeatedly to end

their "game".

Stubbs manages to uncover numerous instances in which the two are role-playing and he makes a

very interesting case that this is exactly what they are doing and not just his imagination reading

into the story. He does make certain assumptions, that their love is not "real", that the characters

are searching for order, which are not completely justified or even necessary to prove his point.

He also forces an intentionality upon Hemingway which could have been avoided without harming

his theory. Towards the end of the essay Stubbs infers that their role-playing is "inferior to true

intimacy," which is a point that, although he defends well, is not central to his theory and seems to

detract from his objectivity.

The essay is a valuable tool to help the reader understand this view of what is happening through

Henry and Catherine's relationship and how they use each other to maintain their self-images,

provide themselves with psychological support, and in a way escape the war. Hemingway may not

have been trying to purposely create a role-playing scenario, but Stubbs' essay will benefit

someone wishing to explore this aspect of the relationship of the two main characters in greater



Bruccoli, Matthew J. and Clark, C.E. Frazer (ed.), Fitzgerald / Hemingway Annual 1973, pp. 271-284, Microcard Editions Books,

Washington, D.C., 1974

About this resource

This coursework was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.

Search our content:

  • Download this page
  • Print this page
  • Search again

  • Word count:

    This page has approximately words.



    If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

    Essay UK, A Farewell To Arms 3. Available from: <> [27-05-20].

    More information:

    If you are the original author of this content and no longer wish to have it published on our website then please click on the link below to request removal: