More coursework: 1 - A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I - J | K - L | M | N - O | P - S | T | U - Y

Church and state

Church and State

Jacob Naylor

Period 4

Research paper

4 March 1996

The theory of evolution is at odds with the views of many religions, and

many people want to allow a religious view of creationism to be taught in the

public school system. The foundation of evolution is based upon the belief that

the origin of all ordered complex systems, including living creatures, can be

explained by natural laws without the initiation or intervention of God. A

person who believes in the biblical model of creation is viewed by some non-

believers as a naive, narrow-minded religious fanatic who is not willing to look

at the observable evidence with an open mind. Because the evolutionary idea of

origins has been so widely accepted by the scientific community, many people

have reasoned that the creation model should be completely rejected without

fairly examining its claims. Even many Christians who have deep trust and faith

in the Bible have never really understood the claims of the creation account

(McLean 11).

Over the past several years, a great deal of controversy surrounding the

creation-evolution issue has been generated by scientists who have based their

claims on the creation model and have been willing to let their reputations

stand. Creationists have openly requested that when the discussion of origins

occurs in the public school system, both the model of creation and evolution be

presented side by side.

Initially, scientists and educators who have accepted the theory of

evolution without question were reluctant to pay any serious attention to

creationism; however, it has now become apparent that substantial numbers of

people are taking creationism seriously. Many evolutionists view this trend as

a serious threat to the advancement of science and have vowed to do everything

in their power to stop the teaching of creation in the public school system.

Most evolutionists now view creationism as nothing more than a particular

version of fundamentalist Christianity with no valid scientific content. One

hundred-fifty years ago such a theory for the origin and history of the earth

and life would have been termed absurd. Today, however, those who reject the

idea of random evolutionary processes being responsible for designing life and

shaping the geological features of the earth are termed religious, unscientific


Today, throughout the industrialized world, the moment children are able

to respond to their environment, they are constantly bombarded with the doctrine

of evolution. Faith in the biblical concept of creation by the hand of God is

ridiculed and rejected by the secular system of education. Humanistic thinking

widely accepts evolution as fact, even though "The all-too frequent picture of

evolution as a progression from ameba to man, is, and always has been, utterly

without foundation" (Weisz 665).

Oddly, it is commonly accepted that all living things are the product of

evolution, that evolution is taking place today, and that evolution will

continue to shape the destiny of life in the future.

Darwin's theory of evolution, based upon the idea of natural selection,

set off a bitter controversy among scientists, religious leaders, and the

general public. Noted British scientists such as Thomas Huxley and Alfred

Wallace supported Darwin's work, and many different groups eventually accepted

the theory of evolution.

After Darwin's idea of the origin and development of life became well

known, others used the concept of evolution for developing theories about

society. A number of new philosophies began to emerge based on the Darwinian

theory. These ideas came onto the world scene and made serious implications

which made a view of agnosticism and atheism respectable. "As far as Darwin was

concerned, a man's religion was his own affair, and he tried to keep his loss of

faith to himself" (Gregor 112). For example, the German philosopher and social

scientist Karl Marx, who is often called the founding father of the communist

movement, compared the struggle for power among social classes to the struggle

for survival among organisms. Marx was so awe stricken by the way Darwin was

able to explain away the need for God regarding the origin of life that he

decided to dedicate Das Kapital, a book against capitalism , to Charles Darwin.

Marx and other humanists of his day believed the individual, not God, is the

highest being.

The acceptance of the evolutionary doctrine soon spread throughout the

academic world in spite of the opposition put forward by scientists and

religious leaders. Most scholars who had swallowed the humanistic philosophy

were proud of the fact that they could explain the physical world around them

without relying upon God.

In many parts of the industrialized world, much of the controversy over

evolution centered on the issue whether the theory should be taught in schools.

Many people would not accept the theory of evolution because it conflicted with

their belief that God is the creator and sustainer of life. The Bible also

states human beings were created in the image of God, and were elevated above

all other forms of life. Because of this view by the majority of people, the

teaching of evolution in the public schools in the United States occurred

through a gradual process over many years.

The first major confrontation regarding the teaching of evolution in

public schools occurred at the famous Scopes trial which took place in Tennessee

in 1925. The effect of the trial on education was felt for many years, as most

schools avoided teaching evolution and publishers produced textbooks that hardly

covered the topic. For years following the Scopes trial, the creation-evolution

controversy was not a high-priority issue. The issue lay dormant until the

1950s, when there was a growing concern among educators that science teaching in

the public schools needed to be upgraded with current evolutionary teaching.

The fact is, "The author or teacher who states [that evolution is an established

fact] is either ignorant of the facts in the case, or is seeking to hide them

from his students" (Schnabel 97).

Works Cited

Gregor, Arthur S. Charles Darwin. E.P. Dutton and Company,

Inc., New York, 1966. Kerkut, ____. Implications of Evolution.

Pergamon Press,

1960. McLean, G.S., Roger Oakland, Larry McLean. The Evidence for

Creation. Understand the Times, Santa Ana, CA., 1995. Schnabel, A.O.

Has God Spoken?. Tampa, FL., A.O.

Schnabel Publisher, 1974. Weisz, Paul. The Science of Biology. McGraw

Hill Book

Company, New York, 1995.

About this resource

This coursework was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.

Search our content:

  • Download this page
  • Print this page
  • Search again

  • Word count:

    This page has approximately words.



    If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

    Essay UK, Church And State. Available from: <> [27-05-20].

    More information:

    If you are the original author of this content and no longer wish to have it published on our website then please click on the link below to request removal: