More coursework: 1 - A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I - J | K - L | M | N - O | P - S | T | U - Y

Civilize the wilderness again

Civilize the Wilderness

Wilderness, why civilize it? This is an interesting question, and one

that is hard to answer. Why not just leave the wilderness alone, and let it

grow and decide it's own beginnings and ends? Does civilizing the wilderness

make it better or worse? In what ways is it better or worse if we leave it

alone or it we civilize it? These are all excellent questions and are all

worthwhile to think about.

Western culture has tried to civilize the wilderness for quite sometime

now, but is it really something we should be doing? In the point of view of

many, the wilderness should be civilized to accommodate for the increasing

number of people in the world. We should also civilize it because we need the

extra room and because we cannot live in uncivilized areas of the wilderness, at

least not with all of the comforts of home. What effects will civilizing the

wilderness now have in the future? Many questions can arise when contemplating

civilizing the wilderness.

The wilderness is being civilized for one main reason. That reason is

technology. Technology plays an important role in everyone's lives today.

Without it, we would not have computers, fax machines, cellular phones, and all

of the modern conveniences that we have today. The fact is, that many people

believe that the wilderness is like an unborn country. A country that has

nothing and is striving to become more advanced. We see this as an opportunity

to better it and make it seem like we are actually helping. But, are we really

helping? In my opinion, no. I feel that we are destroying something natural

and something of beauty.

In many ways we are making the wilderness worse by civilizing it. We

put unnatural objects into the wilderness, and it destroys the wilderness'

natural beauty. Thoreau's ideal is to pretty much leave the wilderness as it is.

If you need to inhabit it, don't use anything that does not come from within it.

For example, Thoreau built his cabin from the trees that were in the wilderness

that surrounded it. In this way, civilizing the wilderness is okay. The way we

are civilizing it, is not okay. Too just clear-cut an entire forest, then build

a house, an in ground swimming pool, and put up a satellite dish, is not exactly

ideal to keeping the wilderness natural.

To destroy the beauty of the wilderness by civilizing it in the way that

we are, we are throwing away a place that we can go and get away from it all.

If we keep on civilizing the wilderness the way we are right now, who says that

there will be any left in the future for us. Will all we have left are the

images of the wilderness that the books we have read give us, or will we stop in

time to save some wilderness? I'm really not sure, but I would like to see the

wilderness survive and be able to exist with us, and not have us destroy it all.


About this resource

This coursework was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.

Search our content:

  • Download this page
  • Print this page
  • Search again

  • Word count:

    This page has approximately words.



    If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

    Essay UK, Civilize The Wilderness Again. Available from: <> [28-05-20].

    More information:

    If you are the original author of this content and no longer wish to have it published on our website then please click on the link below to request removal: