More coursework: 1 - A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I - J | K - L | M | N - O | P - S | T | U - Y

Marks theology reflected in writing 6

Mark's Theology Reflected In Writing

Mark and the other evangelists used basically five ways to change, edit

or enhance Jesus' sayings to reflect their own views of Christianity. According

to the Five Gospels Book, plagiarism and changing of writing was not a crime,

but actually very common Mark's time. Besides, Mark never knew Jesus first-hand,

he somehow had to make a 'story' from basically Hearsay!

Mark groups different parables and sayings of Jesus by topic; making a

false impression that these things happened in order. This may have little

effect on changing the meaning of the lesson, however it illustrates the fact

that Mark was trying to author a "readable" story for people, rather

than a book of facts. The best example would be in Mark 10:17-31 (Jesus Counsel

to the Rich) & (Parable of The Camel and the Eye of a Needle). It is

doubtful that these things happened at the same time; however, they are GREY in

The Five Gospels anyway ... and probably didn't happen as Mark describes. This

brings us to Mark's writing style.

Mark seems to tack-on sentences to Jesus' teachings to make themmore

"Christian." This really changes the meaning more than any other

tactic! Who knows what Mark may have edited-out to accomplish what he wanted to

impress upon his readers? In this, he tries to interpret the meaning of Jesus'

actions ... and does this in a misleadingway! For example: Mark 2:19, Jesus

regarding Fasting. Jesus makes a strong statement against importance to fasting,

but Mark (in 2:20) tags on: "But the days will come when the bridegroom will be

taken away from them, and they will fast in those days."

This blatantly shows that Mark held higher regard for the Old Traditions

of Fasting rather than Jesus' new teachings! This is also an example of

"ChristianizingJesus" according to traditions that have already earned

respect from Jews in their tradition. (Wow, this is starting to sound like a

fight between Today's Political Parties, isn't it?! [Jesus = Liberal Politics /

Judaism = Conservative Politics]).

Finally, Mark likes to "soften the blow" of Jesus' Hard sayings. He

does this for probably the same reason Paul preached that Circumcision was not

required for Christians. A good example is The Unforgivable Sin (Mark 3:28-).

Jesus clearly states that words against the Holy Spirit are unforgivable.

However, Mark adds that "all things are possible with God," which softens this

harsh rule! MARK & THE PAROUSIA

Mark lived during the Jewish War of 66-70 ADE. Unlike the later

evangelists, Matthew and Luke, Mark believed the Parousia was upon us, about to

happen at any time! And, for obvious reason: he lived in an extremely troubled

time for the Jews, and he had not been worried yet by the Parousia's delay as

were later evangelists.

Mark 13:4 - 'Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the

sign when all these things will be fulfilled?' According to Mark's writing,

Jesus first predicts the destruction of the Temple. However, Mark had written

after the destruction of the Temple in 70 ADE! This tactic agrees with The Five

Gospels: writing apocalyptic sayings of Jesus after they have already been

"fulfilled." I would suppose he did this to give credit to his

writing of the second coming of God.

An example is the parable of The Fig Tree in Mark 13:28-37. This

addition, obviously written by Mark and not said by Jesus, shows the urgency in

which Mark expected the parousia: "Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will

by no means pass away till all these things take place."

You can easily see why the other evangelists, Matthew, Luke & John,

re-wrote Mark's apocalyptic writing to be more of a "Sacred Time," and less

definite.

Mark used a common tactic of quoting scripture (especially Dan, Isa, Mic

& some Psalms) for his apocalyptic writing. We also saw this in Paul's

letters years before. People regarded scripture as fact, therefore a perfect

tool to give credit to Mark's & Paul's new writing!

Our own culture today is wrapped-up in tradition and Bible quotes as

undisputable fact, even though people twist these things to promote their own

interests! My own family justifies their hatred for gays by quoting the Bible;

they justify a "Woman's Place" by using the Bible; they justify their racism

through the Bible (saying that "Love your Brother" could only possibly refer to

people of your own color, because your brother could not possibly be of another

color); they justify violent punishment for criminals by using the Bible; they

choose their political party according to their actions being as conservative as

the Bible.

There isn't a day that goes by that I don't wish that my own community

was not still living in the dark-ages.

PART B

THE PARABLE: THE UNFORGIVING SLAVE

This parable reflects a part of our American Lifestyle that is very Un-

-Jesus! Our culture, our government and our judiciary system thrives on

punishment; at least we don't still have debtors' prison!

Contrary to Mark's interpretation of this parable, I belive it

represents a type of perfect love for one's neighbor that is reflected in Jesus'

Kingdom of God. Rather than forcing a rule upon the reader, as Mark does, Jesus

meant it to be a story where the listener may choose an appropriate mode of

behavior; for forgiveness cannot be compromised without undesirable consequences.

Instead, Mark adds a Threat to the end of the parable (which is

obviously NOT the words of Jesus)! "That's what your heavenly Father will do to

you, unless you find it in your heart to forgive ..."

I find in many examples that Jesus wanted to have his followers think

for themselves, and make choices according to their own conscious; He only made

sayings and parables to aid followers in finding the truth for themselves (much

like Socrate's tactic for the finding of Truth or Justice).

Mark, for his own reasons, felt that it was his duty to attach every

saying of Jesus with a command or threat ... therefore making God seem

vindictive!

CONCLUSION: COMPARISON TO MY FIRST PAPER

I remember that when I wrote my first paper, I made a point to discuss

quotes from Jesus that seemed foreign to my traditional feeling for Jesus. I

wanted to see something in Jesus that I never knew before! Well, I was

surprised to find that these same quotes turned-up to be mostly Pink in the Five

Gospels (some grey, but no black)!

My first quote of Jesus was from Matthew 12:49-50; Jesus refers to the

multitudes as his mother and brothers. This turned-up pink in the Five Gospels.

I thought that this quote represented Jesus as a God on a equal level with his

followers, creating a sense of community (I think that if Jesus were around

today (and wasn't in an asylum), he would be a Communist). To me, this

contradicts today's church of authority, having Bishops, Deacons, etc.

Next, I quoted a few of Jesus' words to live by in chapters 6 and 7 of

Matthew. Most of these quotes turned up pink, however a few were mixed with grey,

showing the additions of Matthew's redaction. I noted in my paper that I felt

these rules were simple & logical ways to lead a happy and loving lifestyle,

rather than hard rules that we are used to.

The next two quotes I used (Matthew 12:13 - Jesus Breaking the Sabbath)

(Mark 15:1-15 - Jesus' dealing with P. Pilate) were grey and black in the Five

Gospels. The interesting point to this is that these are the two quotes in

which I criticized Jesus' actions. I made points that I thought Jesus was a

hypocrite in preaching to keep Jewish Law, and at the same time, break the

Sabbath! I also seriously questioned Matthew's interpretation that P. Pilate

tried to save Jesus, knowing that Pilate was not a friend to the Jews! It is

refreshing to me to find these quotes in grey & black, because they were

very confusing to me in forming an opinion about Jesus.

I have enjoyed this assignment because I really feel like I am getting

to understand the Historical New Testament! I tested my knowledge of Jesus by

reading his quotes from my New King James Version Bible, and tried to spot

additions that were not Jesus', and by guessing the color of some of his quotes.

In checking back with The Five Gospels, I found myself to be pretty darn

accurate! Amazing!

Source: Essay UK - http://www.essay.uk.com/coursework/marks-theology-reflected-in-writing-6.php



About this resource

This coursework was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.


Search our content:


  • Download this page
  • Print this page
  • Search again

  • Word count:

    This page has approximately words.


    Share:


    Cite:

    If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

    Essay UK, Marks Theology Reflected In Writing 6. Available from: <https://www.essay.uk.com/coursework/marks-theology-reflected-in-writing-6.php> [06-06-20].


    More information:

    If you are the original author of this content and no longer wish to have it published on our website then please click on the link below to request removal: