More coursework: 1 - A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I - J | K - L | M | N - O | P - S | T | U - Y

Philosophy of sex

In the book Smut, Erotic Reality/ Obscene Ideology , by Murray Davis (1983),

the author expresses the idea that the best source for studying human sexuality objectively

is "soft core", rather than "hard core" pornography. (Davis p. xix). The purpose of this

paper is to critique Davis's claim and to study what understanding of human sexuality

someone might have if they used some other resource that is available today, in this case

the Internet.

Davis argues that , "hard core pornography is usually more abstract and less

explicit than soft-core pornography". (Davis, p. xix, 1983). Davis doesn't go on to

explain how hard-core pornography can be less explicit than soft-core. However he does

explain that hard-core pornography is more abstract in that, it depicts the sex act only and

not the emotional or personal characteristics of the people involved in the act. (Davis,

p. xx) He believes soft-core pornography is describing "a sexual experience", which

conveys characteristics of the participants that are not described by hard-core

pornography. Hard-core pornography describes "sexual behaviour" which involves more

of the act of sex rather than the characteristics and feelings involved with sex. (Davis, p.

xix) Although Davis admits that the vocabulary of sex is changing (Davis, p. xxv), he also

states that hard-core pornography uses considerably more vulgar terms that are associated

with lower-class activity, such as, "prick, fuck, and suck" (Davis, p. xxiii). Davis believes

that hard-core pornography, induces imaginative behaviours by using these lower-class,

four-letter words. The stories use phrases such as "First we sucked, then we

fucked."(Davis p. xix, 1983), to allow the reader the tools to imagine the scene actually

taking place. The reader is lead by the author through the story by using words that may

be more understood or common in the readers' everyday life. He also accuses hard-core

films of being "behavioristic" and "abstract" because they often fail to "fully inform the

audience about the characters personality types and social categories."(Davis, p. xx, 1983)

Soft-core pornography, on the other hand, often depicts "the subtle phenomenological

effects that result when a character's sexual behaviour clashes with his or her personal and

social characteristics." (Davis, p. xx, 1983). In short, he study's literature or films that

involve characters with personalities that are developed and conveyed to the audience. In

these stories the characters will have sex, but the sex may or may not be the main focus of

the story, but rather something that is bound to happen when personal and social

characteristics clash.

I believe that Davis is somewhat correct in assuming that soft-core is a more

objectively reliable source for studying human sexuality. When I hear the words soft-core

pornography, I tend to think of Playboy, or films and movies that depict a story about a

person or group of people, and within that story the characters engage in sexual activity.

This sexual activity is shown or described to the reader/viewer but is not done in a graphic

nature. That is, the actual sexual penetration is not shown or shown very minimally.

Hard-core, on the other hand, is shown or described more graphically. The

dialogue usually includes, as Davis states, four-letter words. The story seems to have less

of a plot and less character development. The main purpose of the work is to show or

describe sex. So it is in this sense that I agree with Davis.

However, I firmly believe that there is not one single resource that is the best

method of studying human sexuality. There are many sources which are helpful when

studying sex and human sexuality. They can range from textbooks, entertainment

magazines, television programs, to movies and novels. In my opinion the most reliable

and important resource for studying human sexuality is personal experience. The actual

hands on, if you will, of sex. All the texts, magazines and movies can show what happens

and maybe guide your learning process, but the only real way to learn is to experience for

oneself. I feel that if a variety of resources are used when studying human sexuality, an

individual will understand and learn all aspects of sexuality in greater detail. Having

learned all aspects of sexuality a person may develop a sense of confidence in their own

sexuality. This may allow for the person to have more respect for sexual orientations or

practices that the individual may not take part in. For example, a person educated in

human sexuality at a university level may realise that homosexuality is normal and should

not be shunned. Whereas, a person not as highly educated in this field may think

homosexuals are not right, or confused. If an individual uses a mixture of hard-core

pornography, soft-core pornography, educational texts, and any other source of

information that is available, the base for their knowledge will be broadened.

With this broadened knowledge base an individual can draw their own lines for

limits in their sexual practises. A person may indulge in sex in similar manner to hard-core

pornography. That is, they may enjoy watching the penetration and using four-letter

words during sex. Or an individual may enjoy sex in more of a soft-core manner.

For example they may like the lights off and be more romantic in their sexual escapades.

I feel that a combination of the two, or even a mixture of many different resources can be

more beneficial to the individuals sexual experience. That way the individual could use the

"hit and miss" method to explore human sexuality. Which means they could try different

things until they find something that they are comfortable with.

I believe that soft-core pornography when used alone is much too vague when

studying human sexuality. All aspects of human sexuality are not dealt with. The

individual would not learn the "plumbing" aspect of sexuality , other than what is seen or

described in soft-core. (i.e. breasts and penis).

If an individual only used hard-core pornography to study human sexuality they

may believe that sex and sexuality are all about the act of sex. They may not learn the

idea of love or the responsibilities associated with sex and sexual activity. The use of only

one resource in studying anything, including human sexuality, limits the quality of

knowledge gained about the particular subject.

One example of a restricted or limited view would be if a person was only using a

resource such as the Internet to study human sexuality. The Internet, or the net, as we all

know, is a vast source of knowledge for virtually every topic imaginable. I believe that a

person would have a very limited view if using the Internet for information on human

sexuality. This would especially ring true if the person did not know how to conduct

advanced studies on the Internet. That is, the person would simply type "human

sexuality" into one of the many search engines on the net. The resulting "hits" or "sites"

(places to find information) would be a wide range of topics. They would likely range

from journal articles about human sexuality to adult oriented articles, which would likely

be hard-core. Another type of hit the "surfer" (a person who browses the Internet) may

find is the adult oriented commercial sites. These sites advertise free sex pictures or live

phone sex.

The problem with using the Internet and only the Internet as a resource for study is

that the information found can be so vast that one may not know where to start. The more

attractive and marketed sites may get more attention. The key words in the description of

the site may draw one's attention to that site and the less attractive sites may be by-passed.

The problem is that the less attractive sites are usually those from universities with an

abundance of credible information. The other sites are basically selling sex not the idea of

the total package of human sexuality.

Another problem is deciding which search engine to use. A search engine is a tool

that one can use to find specific topics on the Internet. Different engines have different

specialities and a different number of sites that are explored. If a person only used one

search engine when looking for sites dealing with human sexuality, an important site that is

catalogued in another search engine may be missed.

With any topic as broad as human sexuality the Internet can be more

overwhelming than it is helpful. As with human sexuality itself , I believe that the best

way to learn how to search the net is by trial and error. By learning how to narrow down

topics that are being searched the individual may be able to find a few sites that fit the

characteristics they are seeking.

Now, the problem is, which characteristics should one look for when learning

about human sexuality? This is another decision that if not made properly could lead to

someone having a limited view of human sexuality. In order to narrow down a search one

must know a little bit about what they are searching for. For example if an alien came here

and tried to research human sexuality, it may not know any aspect of our sexuality to add

to the search. For example, love plays a role in our sexuality. If someone did not know this

they would enter "human sexuality" into the search engine and again may be distracted by

flashy, hard-core, sex-sites and may not find anything on love. The over-all understanding

of human sexuality would be limited according to which sites were looked at.

Although I agree somewhat with Advisee's claim that soft-core , rather than

hard-core pornography, may be a better resource for studying human sexuality. I feel that

using only one resource for information can limit the view and even sometimes distort an

individuals ideas of human sexuality. When using a resource such as the Internet, one may

be overwhelmed with information and marketing tactics may win the attention of

information seekers and take away from the sites that actually offer factual information

regarding human sexuality.

Therefore, I believe that an individual should use all resources available to them

when studying any topic, especially a topic as complex as human sexuality.


Davis, S. Murray. (1983). Smut erotic reality obscene ideology. University of

Chicago Press: Chicago.

Source: Essay UK -

About this resource

This coursework was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.

Search our content:

  • Download this page
  • Print this page
  • Search again

  • Word count:

    This page has approximately words.



    If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

    Essay UK, Philosophy Of Sex. Available from: <> [06-06-20].

    More information:

    If you are the original author of this content and no longer wish to have it published on our website then please click on the link below to request removal: