DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE:
Ralph is a recent widower in his midi-60's, who was diagnosed with metatastasized colon cancer.
He is a home health agency patient, and his primary caregivers a re his two daughters. Ralph is unaware
of the severity of his condition and wanted to know what his state of health and prognosis were.
The nurse evaded his questions initially, and his daughters did not want to tell him that his cancer was terminal.
The nurse's position was not to continue providing care for Ralph, as she would be deceiving him
by not telling him the truth. When the nurse consulted with Ralph's physician, he agreed with the family's
decision, as he felt that they needed time to accept their mother's recent death and Ralph's impending death.
The doctor ordered the nurse not to oppose him and not to disclose any further infomation to Ralph.
THE PRINCIPLE: TRUTH-TELLING & DECEPTION (Should be "FIDELITY")
In most cases, a rational person has a right to truthful information and avoidance
of deception, which will allow him to decide which course of treatment to follow.
A patient's right to decide includes the right to know the truth, not be brainwashed, and not
be lied to or deceived by having information withheld that is relevant to his own health.
There is a moral standard that condemns lies, deception and withholding of relevant
information. To tell Ralph that "everything was all right and he would be up and
around the house in no time at all" is deceptive, as his condition is terminal,
although he does not yet realize it.
The ANA Standards of Clinical Nursing Practice states that clients should be educated
about ther illness, which is subsumed within Standards of Care (p3). In Standard
V-Ethics (p15), measurement criteria #3 states that "the nurse acts as a client
advocate" and #5 states the "nurse delivers care in a manner that preserves
and protects client autonomy, dignity and rights".
The "Patient's Bill of Rights" cites somes cases that justify overriding a patient's
autonomy rights, however. Considering that Ralph has recently lost his wife and that
he is still working through his own grief may present a morally compelling reason
for withholding information and considering Ralph's best interests. His emotional status may need
to be assessed to assure that he would not be suicidal or lose interest in the
remaining quality of his life, also to determine his ability to cope, before
telling him the truth, and prevention of harm overrides autonomy rights.
If I were involved in Ralph's care as his nurse, I would have great difficulty
with deceiving or withhold information from him, but considering the impact of his
wife's death, combined with the knowledge of his own inevitable demise, I would take
into consideration his emotional state first, as his advocate, and work with his daughters
in establishing a set time to inform him of his condition, assuming that he has
at least a few months to live. This will hopefully allow the daughters more time
to accept their mother's death and their father's condition. We would have to
agree not to lie to Ralph outright, but to encourage him to participate in his own
care as much as possible, as well as perform his own ADL's as tolerated. By so doing, Ralph would
be able to maintain his dignity, his daughters would be placated, and a lawsuit hopefully
American Nurses Assoc (1991). Standards of clinical nursing practice. american
Nurses Publishing. Washington, DC.
Bandman, E. & Bandman, B. (1995). Nursing ethics through the life span. appleton & Lange. Norwalk, CT.
Source: Essay UK - http://www.essay.uk.com/coursework/protecting-dad-from-the-bad-news.php