More coursework: 1 - A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I - J | K - L | M | N - O | P - S | T | U - Y

Shakespeares sonnets

Shakespeare's Sonnets

LOVE AS A DYNAMIC FORCE IN SHAKESPEARE'S SONNETS

Shakespeare's love sonnets describe three different contexts in which love

operates, as such, he depicts a multi-faceted picture of love. Love in Shakespeare's poems

does not have a single definition, but rather, an intangible conglomeration of

characteristics that, together, make up an ever powerful force that defeats all obstacles. In

Shakespeare's love Sonnets numbers 116, 130, and 147, love is depicted as an

overwhelming force that triumphs over time, the physical world, and reason, respectively.

The force of love overpowers Shakespeare's era's cultural ideals of physical beauty in

sonnet 130. In poem number 147, the speaker's reasonable mind is overridden by emotions

which arise from his love and desire for his absent partner. Finally, in sonnet 116, love is

given an identity as an immortal force, which overcomes age, death, and thus, time. On

another level, these three sonnets can be seen as describing the three different identities of

love (Rowse, Shakespeare's Sonnets 46). Love can be seen as an internally possessed

force which is directed within oneself; love can be an internal force which is directed

against external factors, or love can be an external force, operating independently,

regardless of the individual, and overcoming other powerful external forces. As such,

these sonnets create a vision of love as a dynamic and multi-relational force.

Each sonnet describes a different conflict in which love is engaged. In sonnet 116,

love is depicted as an invincible force that defies time as well as time's effects on beauty

and youth, changes such as wrinkles and old age. "Love's not Time's fool, though rosy lips

and cheeks/Within his bending sickle's compass come (Lines 9 and 10)." Love, unlike the

physical being, is not subject to decay. Through the capitalization of the words Love and

Time, Shakespeare personifies both of these words, giving them identities, which are

independent of any possessor (Angelou et al 22). Time becomes godlike, omnipotent yet

abstract. Love, too, becomes a powerful character, despite remaining physically intangible.

Love is presented as an entity with supernatural qualities. This identity is everlasting,

immortal, and unaffected be the passing of Time, which is also eternal. In many of

Shakespeare's sonnets, Time is often portrayed as the destroyer of all that is happy and

beautiful, because with time, everything changes, happiness fades and what was once

beautiful fades away and then dies (Brown 79). The speaker claims that his love, real love,

is untouched be the cruel hand of Time. "Love," he says, "is an ever-fixed mark that looks

on tempests and is never shaken (Lines 5 and 6)." According to Shakespeare, true Love is

more permanent and powerful than Time, hence, love remains immutable despite the

changes brought on by physical decay and despite changes wrought by the world, such as

storms, wars and revolutions (Rowse, A Biography 67).

Shakespeare further develops upon his ideas of love as a force which overcomes

the restraints of physical existence in Sonnet number 130. In this poem, Shakespeare

expands his definition of love to include an image of love as a force that overcomes social

pressures. Shakespeare's speaker resists the conventions of his era's romantic poetry by

describing his lover as an exception to all of the traditional romantic metaphors for beauty

(Ballou 126). Shakespeare refutes one of his culture's most basic ideals: that of the

universal standard of beauty, "if snow be white, why then her breasts are dun (Line 3)."

Unlike other romantic poets of his time, in Sonnet 130 the speaker describes his beloved

as an earthly and realistic woman. She, unlike most women in poetry, is not

misrepresented. Shakespeare's speaker does not use false metaphors to describe her

(Booth 84). He is able to depict her in human terms because, to the speaker, love is not

based on physical beauty but rather on feelings, sensibilities, and affections.

According to Shakespeare, love is more profound than the materialistic, romantic

poems of his era seem to imply. Love overcomes the romantic imagery of what the ideal

woman should look like.

The speaker's love is, in this case, overcoming one physical reality of his situation: that his

mistress may not be beautiful enough to deserve love and poetry, according to his culture's

expectations of beauty. Shakespeare's speaker does not portray his lover as a goddess or

as a princess; she does not float on air as she walks (Brown 92). She is simply a human

being, a woman, yet she is special to him, regardless of her physical attributes (Brown 93).

In discussing the realistic and human qualities of his lover, Shakespeare's speaker

only disparages her physical attributes, and does not disparage either her mind or her soul-

the things that truly sustain love. His love for the woman prevails and triumphs over her

mere humanity, his love is unrestrained and exceptional, and by virtue of his remarkable

love, he remains unconcerned with her appearance (Giroux 44). Shakespeare speaks of a

love that is not subject to the rules and ideals created by social pressures that claim that

one's beloved must look a certain way. Shakespeare's speaker refutes, through his love, a

very powerful social pressure that claims that women are worthless if they do not live up

to the societal standard of beauty (Giroux 46). To the speaker, his mistress is worthy of

love, no matter what she looks like. She remains special to him for reasons beyond those

of appearance.

Another conflict in which love is engaged is the conflict of love versus reason.

Sonnet 147 depicts love as defying reason and truth. The speaker's reason was once, "the

physician to [his] love (Line 5)," but it has now left him. In the past reason and

rationalization where the means by which the speaker recovered from and escaped the

torment of the emotions created by the absence of his beloved (Ballou 135) . Reason

dictates that emotional pain will eventually fade as the pangs of lost love will diminish over

time, as one is forced to move on to new experiences (Ballou 135). However, this poem

describes a clear exception to this rule.

The strength of his rational mind is not diminishing the pains of his emotions. On the

contrary, the speaker is losing his sanity as time progresses. In the past, perhaps, the

speaker's rational thought processes allowed him to cope with failed romances. However,

in the presence of this love for his dark mistress, all his logical mental abilities are

overpowered. His rational mind, which he depends on for truth and sanity, has left him in

the face of love. The torment of love has made it impossible for the speaker to make

truthful, objective observations about his world ("Companion to" 43). In this poem,

Shakespeare claims that it is love, not reason, that shapes one's perception of the world,

for one's mind, the ideal and rational judgment-maker, is subject to and overwhelmed by

the whims of emotion ("Companion to" 44). At the beginning of Sonnet 147, the speaker's

love is described as a fever, but as the sonnet continues, the effects of love intensify.

Towards the end of the poem, love has completely overwhelmed his mind, inducing him to

become "frantic-mad (Line 10)." He continues, "My thoughts and my discourse as mad

men's are, /At random from the truth vainly expressed (Lines 10 and 11)." The language

Shakespeare chooses further emphasizes the crazed effect love has had on the speaker's

mind (Rowse, A Biography 72). The word "discourse", for instance, derives from Latin,

meaning "to run about." The use of this word creates a clear image of a mad man running

wild and uncontrolled. This love not only makes him go insane, it also blinds him from the

truth (Rowse, A Biography, 74). He says, "For I have sworn thee fair and thought thee

bright, /Who art as black as hell, as dark as night (Lines 13 and 14) ." The speaker's

logical mind knows that his woman is evil, yet his love for her blinds him and he sees her

as beautiful.

Love, then, is, for Shakespeare, a force that operates within several different

contexts. As such, love has a multi-faceted definition, which yields to a multi-faceted

identity. Shakespeare defines love in three different ways.

First, love can be seen as an internal force fighting against other internal forces, as we see

in Sonnet 147, where the speaker's inner turmoil stems from the battle of his love against

his reason within himself. Second, Shakespeare epics love as an internal force which

battles external forces, such as social pressures. Finally, Shakespeare portrays love on an

even larger scale, where Love is an external power that, independent of any individual,

struggles against and then defeats Time, another external entity (Booth 14). Clearly, if

love is an overwhelming, forceful entity that defeats time, death, social pressures, and

reason, then love is no longer simply an internalized emotion; it is also an externalized

power which can exist independent of human beings (Booth 22). Sonnet 147 deals with

love as an internal agony where there is no mention of outside forces at play. This is a

personal poem where Shakespeare uses the metaphor of disease and illness to represent

the obsessive love which has taken over his speaker's senses ("The Works" 119) . The

speaker describes an internal battle where his mind is being devoured by his crazed

sickness, love. Both his love and his reason though, are internalized, sparring forces. In

contrast to poem 147, Sonnet 130 describes the experiences of a man's struggle against

external, social factors, such as his culture's romantic ideal for one's beloved. Here, the

speaker's love is an internal force which overcomes external factors, as the speaker uses

love as a justification for his adoring relationship with a woman ("The Works" 134). In

Sonnet 116, Shakespeare goes one step further, and depicts two external forces, Love and

Time, battling each other. These forces are independent of the speaker and his lover. In

this poem, love has an elevated status as an individual entity, superseding the control of

the individual human beings. Thus, through these three poems, Shakespeare presents a

personification of love whose nature and function vary depending on the context (Ballou

121) .

Shakespeare's love sonnets depict love as an overwhelming force that manages to

overcome death, reason and social pressures. By showing love from three varying

perspectives, Shakespeare grants love a multifarious personality, powerful and flexible

enough to defeat any obstacle. Love is not merely a disease that eats at one's soul, nor

simply a source of inner strength, nor just a sweeping, uncontrollable, godlike entity; it is a

conglomeration of the three. As such, love is a fierce and powerful, albeit elusive being

that shapes one's life. Shakespeare melds different perceptions of love to form a more

comprehensive image of that ineffable emotion.

Word Count: 1805

Source: Essay UK - http://www.essay.uk.com/coursework/shakespeares-sonnets.php



About this resource

This coursework was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.


Search our content:


  • Download this page
  • Print this page
  • Search again

  • Word count:

    This page has approximately words.


    Share:


    Cite:

    If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

    Essay UK, Shakespeares Sonnets. Available from: <https://www.essay.uk.com/coursework/shakespeares-sonnets.php> [27-05-20].


    More information:

    If you are the original author of this content and no longer wish to have it published on our website then please click on the link below to request removal: